Showing posts with label Acros. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Acros. Show all posts

Saturday, April 20, 2024

More Fun in South Shreveport, Louisiana

In previous articles, we looked around Olympia, Washington. Let us take a quick diversion back to the US South. 

On our way from Vicksburg to Houston, we overnighted in Shreveport, Louisiana. I wanted to do a last documentation in a southern neighborhood that shows elements of traditional wood architecture, decay, and neglect. In the morning, we drove west on 70th street in south Shreveport and looked at some of the side streets. The light was soft and even, quite suitable for architecture. 

Click any picture to see it at 1600 pixels on the long dimension.


Quiet times on Bates Street (Fuji Acros film, Spotmatic F camera, 28mm ƒ/3.5 SMC Takumar lens)
Cottage on Bates Street (24mm ƒ/3.5 SMC Takumar lens)
Bates Street house


Bates Street was quiet, with empty lots and houses that were boarded up. I could not tell if they were going to be repaired. If they were to be demolished, no one would have bothered to secure the window with plywood, so possibly there was a plan to restore some of them. Still, it is not a pretty scene. 


Bethany Street
Bethany Street house (24mm ƒ/3.5 SMC Takumar lens)

Bethany Street had many empty lots, meaning the former houses had been razed and the lots graded. 


Time for some crawfish at 925 E. 70th Street


7020 Line Avenue - not much happening now
The Little Shanty art store on Line Avenue, also unfortunately closed

Line Avenue runs north south. It was more commercial than the side streets but was very quiet. The street just to the right of The Little Shanty was East 71st Street. It offered a bit more photographic material.

Shed on E. 71st Street
Fixer-upper shed on E. 71st Street (28mm ƒ/3.5 SMC Takumar lens)
Asphalt shingle cottage, 569 E. 71st Street

Asphalt shingles were common mid-century for inexpensive housing. We look down on it now, but it was a practical building material because it was easy to install, inexpensive, long-lasting, and repelled bugs and vermin. It did not need repainting, as do shingles or clapboard.
 
Non-cottage, E. 71st Street
Duplex under renovation, E. 71st Street
Another duplex, E. 71st Street

Some of the houses on E. 71st Street were being renovated. That is a hopeful sign.


Muscle Therapy Center, 7101 Southern Avenue

This clinic is in a rather bunker-like brick building with burglar bars over the windows. It was unfortunate pragmatic (=cheap) architecture and looked unkept.

This finishes our quick tour on October 26, 2023, of a neighborhood in south Shreveport, Louisiana. Maybe I posted too many photographs. But, I may never return to this part of the world, although one never knows. 

I took these frames with my Pentax Spotmatic F camera and 24mm or 28mm SMC Takumar (thread-mount lenses) using Fuji Acros 100 film (exposed at EI=80). These lenses were multi-coated and among the best mid-price 1970s optics for SLR cameras. Praus Productions in Rochester, NY, developed the film. I scanned it with a Plustek 7600i film scanner operated by Silverfast Ai software. I made minor contrast adjustments with Photoshop CS6.  


Friday, April 12, 2024

Into the Woods Again: Squaxin Park in Monochrome (Oly 06)

Squaxin Park (formerly Priest Point Park) is a botanical wonder just north of downtown Olympia off East Bay Drive NE. I have photographed here in color with my little digital Fuji X-E1 camera. How about monochrome? (Warning, "pretty" pictures below; no urban decay.)


Ellis Cove and view west to East Bay (Fuji Acros film, Spotmatic F camera, 28mm ƒ/3.5 SMC Takumar lens)
Ellis Cove (Fuji Acros film, 28mm SMC Takumar lens)

The temperature plummeted on January 11 (2024) and some snow fell. That was too good to resist. I walked to Squaxin Park but was surprised that not much snow had made it through the dense canopy down to the ground.


Samarkand Rose Garden (Kodak Panatomic-X film, Hasselblad 501CM camera, 80mm ƒ/2.8 Planar lens, yellow-green filter)
Near Ellis Cove (Panatomic-X film, 100mm ƒ3.5 Planar lens)
Near Ellis Cove (Panatomic-X film, 100mm ƒ/3.5 Planar lens, yellow-green filter)

On East Bay Drive, a dense multi-trunk tree often catches my eye.


East Bay Drive NE (Kodak Tri-X 400 film, Hasselblad 501CM, 100 mm ƒ/3.5 Planar lens, 1/125 ƒ/4)

Another snow fell on February 14, and I returned to Squaxin Park with the Hasselblad. Maybe I will show those frames in mid-summer..... 

Thank you all for exploring Squaxin Park with me.


Monday, March 4, 2024

Heading West Through Texas, October 2023

We were in a hurry heading west. It had been stressful to escape Houston via US290, but at least we could use the HOV lanes. As dusk approached, we passed through Somerville, a town about half way between Houston and Austin. I saw a large BNSF rail yard and had to stop and take a frame or two in the gloomy dusk light. 


The view west, Somerville, Texas (Fuji Acros film, 135mm ƒ/3.5 SMC Takumar lens hand-held)


A day later, we were still driving west through Texas. Wow, what a large state. Long-term readers may remember that in November of 2022, we drove to the Rio Grande Valley. That took two days, also. 


Lockwood Street, Tahoka, Texas (55mm ƒ/1.8 SMC Takumar lens)

Drizzle was falling, and we need to take a stretch break. As I recall, there was no coffee shop in Tahoka. 


Sorry, I could not resist, a gaudy phone pic. of a former gas station with a cover to keep off the rain. 

This was a frustrating trip. I wanted to spend at least two weeks on the trip and do some creative photography, but we had to rush to Olympia to meet the moving truck. One of us should have flown to Olympia and then returned to some airport en route to continue a more leisurely drive. Texas offers a lot of interesting photo subject matter, even in small towns like the examples above. It has been fun exploring Texas. But will I ever return to the great open expanses? 

Please type "Texas" in the search box to see previous articles. 

I took the black and white frames on Fuji Acros film with my Pentax Spotmatic F camera and 55mm and 135mm lenses.

Tuesday, October 10, 2023

Danger: GAS and a Review of the Pentax Spotmatic F

Good things come in a box

The Danger of GAS


Yes, I know, I have no discipline. I have enough cameras to last the rest of my days and swore that I would not buy any more hardware except for specific accessory items, like filters. But Jim Grey, my friend from Indiana, extolled the virtues of the Pentax Spotmatic F body. This was the last version of the famous 35mm camera line that accepted 42mm thread-mount lenses. The F featured open-aperture metering, meaning the viewfinder did not darken as you stopped down the lens. My older regular Spotmatic uses stop-down metering. This seldom posed any inconvenience, but the option of open aperture metering sounded tempting. Well, you know the story, GAS (Gear Acquisition Syndrome, not flatulence) overcame me. Soon, a handsome Spotmatic F along with the magnificent 50mm ƒ/1.4 SMC Takumar lens appeared in a box. Total cost was $49 including shipping. You can buy this level of craftsmanship and excellence for $49 in 2023?

After an initial test, I sent the camera to Eric Hendrickson, one of the best-known Pentax repair people in the USA. It and the 50mm lens came back clean and ready to go. He emphasized that the light meter will work correctly with 625A (alkaline) batteries. Internet "experts" go back and forth about which batteries will and will not work, but I trust Mr. Hendrickson. The original specification was for 625 mercury cells, but these have not been available for at least 25 years. The 625S (silver) cells are also now gone. The 625A batteries do not last long in this camera, so possibly there is a minor current drain. But the cells are inexpensive, and I remove them when I am not using the camera. (General camera rule: ALWAYS remove batteries when you will not use a camera for weeks or longer.)


Spotmatic Cameras


Mike Johnston wrote about the Spotmatic in The Online Photographer in 2017 and explained why the Pentax 50mm ƒ/1.4 lens was one of the finest 50s in the film era. The table below lists the various Spotmatic models.


Asahi Pentax Screw-Mount Cameras 1     

Model 2

Date

Features

Original

1957

Modern appearance, right side wind lever, instant return mirror. ≈ $199 with 55 mm f/2.2.

S

1957

Contemporary geometric sequence of shutter speeds. 9 lenses available.

K

1958

Semi-automatic diaphragm

Asahi S3 (identical to Honeywell H3)

1960

Fully automatic diaphragm.  $199 with 55 f/1.8 lens.

Honeywell H1

1961

 $150;  1/500 top speed.  World's first clip-on CdS meter available ($32).

Asahi S3v (Honeywell H3v)

1963 1969

Added self-timer and automatic frame counter.

Asahi S1a  (H1a)

1963 - 1969

Added auto frame counter.  14 lenses available.

Spotmatic

1964 - 1971

Through-the-lens CdS meter.  $299 with 50 f/1.4.  Very popular!  Most chrome, some black paint.  Motorized model made in 1970 (uncommon).  Rare 250-exposure model.

SL

1969

Same as Spotmatic but without CdS meter.

Spotmatic 500

1971

Lower cost, 1/500 top speed, supplied with 55 f/2.0 lens.

Spotmatic II

1971

Added accessory shoe; sold with multi-coated lenses with extra indexing levers.

Spotmatic IIa

1972

Sensor for automatic Honeywell flash.

ES

1972

First Pentax auto exposure camera with electronically-controlled shutter.

Spotmatic F

1974

Finest manual Spotmatic; open-aperture metering, $375 with 55mm f/1.8.

SP 1000

1974

No self-timer

ESII

1974?

Improved reliability over ES. End of the era for Pentax screw-mount bodies.

Notes:

1.  Sources: “A History of Pentax” articles by W. L. Fadner in Shutterbug (1988)

2.  U.S. cameras had the Honeywell name and logo on the prism.  International models were labeled with the Asahi name and logo. 



M42 thread mount


M42 refers to the thread mount of 42×1 mm used to attach the lens to the camera body. This was a common size in the 1950s through the 1970s. European, Russian, and Japanese companies made hundreds of M42 lenses in various focal lengths. Many people consider the Asahi Optical Company's examples to be among the best optically and mechanically in the 1960s and 1970s. It is common to buy an old Takumar lens that will still operate perfectly, while a drastically more expensive Leica lens of similar age will often have haze or film on the inner elements and need professional cleaning and re-lubrication. Takumar lenses have a following among serious photographers today because they can be mounted on most mirrorless digital cameras. The M42 mount lost popularity in the 1970s because it was slow to exchange lenses, while companies like Nikon, Minolta, and Canon used faster bayonet mounts on their cameras. 



Simplicity and meticulous craftsmanship
Utter simplicity: rewind knob, flash shoe, shutter speed dial, shutter release, and wind lever. No baffling 400-page instruction manual needed.
Set the film speed in the window within the shutter speed dial. Note it is still shown as ASA.
SMC (Super Multi Coated) 50mm ƒ/1.4 lens, mid-1970s.

Examples with Kodak Plus-X Film


Jim Grey sent me two rolls of Kodak Plus-X film. He bought a brick and said the first two rolls performed correctly. I used Plus-X in the 1970s but rarely since then. Plus-X was a traditional cubic-grain film, not one of the more modern T-grain emulsions, like T-Max 100. I will write more about Plus-X in a later article. Here are some examples from Vicksburg, Mississippi, during March of 2023. On some of my walks, I even wore the camera in its handy leather camera case (also known as a never-ready case). 


Waiting for a ride, 2620 Washington Street (50mm ƒ/1.4 SMC Takumar lens)
Monroe Street view south (135mm ƒ/3.5 SMC Takumar, ƒ/5.6)
Minor trouble at the corner of Marshal and Harris Streets (35mm ƒ/3.5 Super-Takumar lens)

I really like this 35mm ƒ/3.5 Super-Takumar lens. This is one of the older versions that must be stopped down for the light meter measurement. The Spotmatic F is supposed to be capable of both open-aperture as well as stop-down metering. But mine gives the wrong exposure for the latter mode. I sent the body back to Mr. Hendrickson to check, but it still does not meter quite right. That is a minor inconvenience because I usually carry a hand-held meter. The newer Super-Multi-Coated and SMC Takumars all have the tab for open aperture metering on the F and ESII bodies. 

Garage on Polk Street in unoccupied but not abandoned house (50mm ƒ/1.4)
Cottage at 733 Johnson Street. It has been razed since I took this picture (50mm ƒ/1.4).
Ford Street (Leica IIIC, 50mm ƒ/2 Canon lens (1960s version), yellow-green filter)

Silos, Hwy. 80, Delta, Louisiana (135mm ƒ/3.5 SMC Takumar, polarizing filter)

The meter in the Spotmatic F measures correctly with a polarizing filter mounted on the lens. This camera works perfectly well with a linear polarizer. Many novice photographers insist that they need a CPL or circular polarizer (after all, they saw it on YouTube). No, usually they do not. A CPL is required for cameras that use a beam-splitter for auto-focus function.

Examples with Fuji Acros Film



House on Bethany Street, Shreveport, Louisiana (24mm ƒ/3.5 SMC Takumar lens, Fuji Acros film).

The Spotmatic F meter seems to work correctly with a wide lens, in this case, 24mm. But this was not a severe test because the light was soft and overcast that day. Spotmatic meters are have a broad coverage area, so you need to point the camera slightly downward to avoid having the bright sky fool the meter. 

The Little Shanty art store, Line Avenue, Shreveport, Louisiana (28mm ƒ/3.5 SMC Takumar lens)
The road west in the rain, Tahoka, Texas (55mm ƒ/1.8 SMC Takumar lens)

Summary


I am very pleased with my Spotmatic F. The open aperture metering is certainly convenient, and the measurements closely match reflected light readings from my Gossen Luna Pro digital hand-held light meter. The camera feels good and fits my hands perfectly. It is compact and only slightly more bulky than a Leica M camera. It demonstrates meticulous 1970s craftsmanship and precision, the finest of Japanese production. What is not to like?

And I like the gritty feel of Plus-X film. It is grainy, but that is suitable for this type of subject matter. 

Appendix


Here is my wife's 1971 Spotmatic camera with its superb 55mm ƒ/1.8 Super-Takumar lens. As you can see, the camera looks very similar to the 1974 or 1975 Spotmatic F. This camera has been to USA, Europe, Iceland, the Middle East, and the Nile River and has always performed flawlessly. This 55mm lens is single-coated and has at least one element with thorium salts. The lens had yellowed over the years, but treating it with a small LED table lamp from Ikea cleared the yellow tone. Many manufactures added thorium salts to their glass mixtures in the 1940s through the 1970s. No studies have ever demonstrated any health effects from the minor amount of radiation. I think this particular 55 is higher resolution than my later SMC 55.